<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How wide is your width?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/2006/how-wide-is-your-width/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/2006/how-wide-is-your-width/</link>
	<description>Websites for Small Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:08:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emil</title>
		<link>http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/2006/how-wide-is-your-width/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/?p=5#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Yes, exactly. I forgot to add that this is why I never got to use Newsvine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, exactly. I forgot to add that this is why I never got to use Newsvine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr angry</title>
		<link>http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/2006/how-wide-is-your-width/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>mr angry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigbeardesign.net/blog/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>A personal bugbear of mine when working with designers who want more width.  Besides you put of non-maxed windows, look at the downsides:

800 width and browser is at 1024?  Downside is some white space.  Big deal.

1024 width and browser is at 800?  They can&#039;t use the damn site!  A bit more serious as a downside, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A personal bugbear of mine when working with designers who want more width.  Besides you put of non-maxed windows, look at the downsides:</p>
<p>800 width and browser is at 1024?  Downside is some white space.  Big deal.</p>
<p>1024 width and browser is at 800?  They can&#8217;t use the damn site!  A bit more serious as a downside, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

